artificial intelligence

Subscribe to artificial intelligence via RSS

The FTC’s settlement with Cleo AI gives some indication as to what we might see from the agency in the coming months. The FTC alleged, among other things, that Cleo AI’s actions violated Section 5 of the FTC Act. In particular, as reported in our sister blog, Cleo AI required people to enroll in a paid subscription plan, even though they marketed their services as free. It also made it difficult for people to cancel their subscription and made it hard to stop recurring charges. The company also failed to disclose material terms.Continue Reading Lessons from the FTC: The Cleo AI Settlement

Virginia’s Governor, Glenn Youngkin, vetoed a bill this week that would have regulated “high-risk” artificial intelligence systems. HB 2094, which narrowly passed the state legislature, aimed to implement regulatory measures akin to those established by last year’s Colorado AI Act. At the same time, Colorado’s AI Impact Task Force issued concerns about the Colorado law, which may thus undergo modifications before its February 2026 effective date. And in Texas, a proposed Texas Responsible AI Governance Act was recently modified.Continue Reading US State AI Legislation: Virginia Vetoes, Colorado (Re)Considers, and Texas Transforms

The Oregon AG’s Office, along with the state’s Department of Justice, issued guidance late last year on how state laws apply to the ways businesses use AI. The guidance may be two months old, but the cautions are still timely. The guidance seeks to give companies direction on times when AI uses might be regulated by existing state laws.Continue Reading Oregon’s AI Guidance: Old Laws in Scope for New AI

The New Jersey AG and the Division on Civil Rights’ new guidance on algorithmic discrimination explains how AI tools might be used in ways that violate the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination. The law applies to employers in New Jersey, and some of its requirements overlap with new state “comprehensive” privacy laws. In particular, those laws’ requirements on automated decisionmaking. Those laws, however, typically do not apply in an employment context (with the exception of California). This New Jersey guidance (which mirrors what we are seeing in other states) is a reminder that privacy practitioners should keep in mind AI discrimination beyond the consumer context.Continue Reading New Jersey Discrimination Law Guide: Applicability of Existing Laws to AI Tools

At the end of 2024 the Italian Data Protection Authority issued a 15 million euro fine in the first generative AI-related case brought under GDPR. According to Garante (the Italian authority), OpenAI trained ChatGPT with users’ personal data without first identifying a proper legal basis for the activity, as required under GDPR. The Order also alleges that OpenAI failed to notify Garante about a data breach the company experienced in March 2023. Additionally, the Order states that OpenAI did not provide proper age verification mechanisms for users under age 13. Continue Reading Don’t Forget the EU: Italy Issued First GenAI Fine of €15 Million Alleging GDPR Violations 

New York has a new AI-related law which took effect January 1. The law regulates creation and use of digital replicas of an individual’s voice or likeness and is similar to those in California and Tennessee.Continue Reading New Year, New Protections for New York Artists and AI-Generated Replicas

In the waning months of the current administration, the White House issued a memo setting forth actions focused on national security as directed in the AI Executive Order from last year. As a reminder, the order -while directed to government agencies- also had impacts on how businesses use of artificial intelligence.Continue Reading ‘All Hands on Deck’ – White House Continues to Call on Agencies for AI National Security Plan

The dust is beginning to settle from the raft of AI-related bills Governor Newsom signed last month in California. (See for example, our post about neural data.) Most of the provisions will not go into effect for another few months. Before they do, it is worth examining the impact they will have on companies’ privacy and data security practices. Most, as we outline below, may not change fundamental practice, but instead serve as a reminder to take into account privacy and data security considerations when assessing and implementing AI tools:Continue Reading The Privacy and Data Security Impact of California’s Recent AI Bills

The New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) recently published guidance on managing cyber risks related to AI for the financial services and insurance industry. Though the circular letter does not introduce any per se “new” obligations, the guidance speaks to the Agency’s expectations for addressing AI within its existing cybersecurity regulations. Continue Reading NYDFS Speaks Out on AI and its Cybersecurity Risks

Illinois recently updated its employment law, the Illinois Human Rights Act to prohibit discriminatory uses of AI. Artificial intelligence as defined by the amendment will cover generative artificial intelligence, not just traditional AI. The amendments are set to take effect on January 1, 2026.Continue Reading Illinois Updates Employment Law to Address Artificial Intelligence

As we enter the end of the summer, the AI regulatory steam is not slowing down. Colorado is now the first US state to have a comprehensive AI law (going into effect February 1, 2026), and the EU published its sweeping AI law in July (with rolling applicability between February 2025 and August 2026).Continue Reading AI Summer Roundup: EU and Colorado Celebrate Summer with AI Legislation